Court disqualifies Gov. Aiyedatiwa from contesting 2nd term in Ondo


A Federal High Court in Akure, Ondo State, has restrained Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa from seeking another term in office.

The court ruled that allowing him to contest again would violate the constitutional limit on tenure.

Delivering judgment on Thursday, Justice Toyin Bolaji Adegoke held that the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria does not permit an elected President, Vice President, Governor, or Deputy Governor to remain in office for more than eight years.

The judge ruled that if Aiyedatiwa were allowed to contest and win another term, it would exceed the constitutional limit.

PAY ATTENTION: Download the Dockaysworld News App on Google Play for Instant Updates on Breaking Stories. DOWNLOAD NOW to Enjoy a Faster, Smoother and Lesser Ads Experience. Soon on App Store!!!

“If the third defendant is allowed to contest and serve another four years, that will be against the position of the law as established in Marwa v. Nyako, where the Supreme Court held that a President or Governor cannot serve beyond eight years,” the judge said.

Aiyedatiwa first assumed office on December 27, 2024, following the death of former governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, whose tenure he completed.

He was later sworn in again on February 24, 2025, after winning the November 16, 2024 governorship election under the platform of the All Progressives Congress, defeating Agboola Ajayi of the Peoples Democratic Party.

The suit was filed by an APC member, Akin Egbuwalo, who asked the court to interpret Section 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution regarding the governor’s eligibility to seek re-election.

Defendants in the case included the Independent National Electoral Commission, the Attorney-General of the Federation, Aiyedatiwa, the APC, and Deputy Governor Olayide Adelami.

Justice Adegoke noted that the legal processes filed by the third to fifth defendants were deemed abandoned because they did not participate in the hearing.

She also dismissed the objection raised by the first defendant.

“This court finds that the action filed by the plaintiff discloses a valid cause of action and cannot be dismissed as speculative or academic,” she held.

The judge added that courts have the authority to interpret the Constitution whenever such interpretation is sought.

“Whenever a court is invited to interpret any provision of the Constitution, the court has the inherent jurisdiction to hear and determine such a matter because the court itself is a creation of law and must uphold the Constitution at all times,” she said.

The court subsequently granted all the reliefs sought by the plaintiff, effectively restraining Aiyedatiwa from seeking another term as governor of Ondo State.

PAY ATTENTION: Follow Dockaysworld on Whatsapp to never miss breaking news. JOIN US NOW to get news that matters at your convenience!!


Follow Dockaysworld
Subscribe
Notify of

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments